Featured Media

Even a single hallucinated line of C code can break memory

Speed is nothing without safety. Discover why AI isn't replacing engineers, but making their role as 'system auditors' more critical than ever

Get In Touch

The narrative that AI will end programming or replace engineers doesn't reflect the reality of technical teams. Instead, AI is shifting responsibilities toward higher-level system integrity and validation.

  • The Hallucination Risk: In embedded systems, a single "hallucinated" line of C-code can break memory, disrupt interrupt routines, or cause undefined behavior that synthetic environments might not catch.
  • Validation vs. Velocity: While tools like GitHub Copilot can speed up coding by 55%, the time saved is often redirected to deeper testing and security audits.
  • Hardware and EDA Gains: AI-assisted design workflows in hardware (like Synopsys) can explore design spaces 3x faster, but engineers must still verify these results against real-world constraints like EMC requirements and industry standards.
  • The Human Factor: AI lacks the "experiential intuition" to understand mechanical tolerances, thermal loads, or long-term wear and tear—areas where experienced engineers remain indispensable.
  • 2026 Shift: As AI becomes standard infrastructure, the value of an engineer will be measured less by lines of code and more by their ability to guide, refine, and ensure the safety of intelligent tools.

Read the full story here

Talk to a human